10/26/08

Needed renovations, or setting the roof on fire?


Our exposure to health care policy - as part of our primary care curriculum - ran the gamut recently.

Last week we went to Washington to advocate for increased support for the primary care workforce. (In brief: we need more primary care health care providers. There aren't going to be enough of them, especially if we start covering the uninsured. We need to create incentives to help people choose to go into primary care rather than the oversubscribed and overpaid subspecialties.) We spoke to young, fresh-faced, intelligent, and hyperinformed health care staffers of some of the Capitol's most influential senators - they were genuinely friendly and happy to see us.

One senator's office is working on a creative idea left over (so they said) from Hillarycare, a "foundation" to ensure a funding stream for primary care education, training, and loan repayment, paid for by a tax on insurance companies. Of course, no one in the room disagreed with that. Everyone realizes that primary care training needs to be dissociated from the current system, private insurance companies and hospitals included. (Our very friendly lobbyist, paid for by NYU Medical Center and along with us to make sure we didn't say anything stupid, was not very excited to hear about this idea.)

This week (thanks to a colleague of mine, whose father is a fundraiser for the senator in question) we went to the office of the junior senator from New York. We spoke to her for fifteen minutes about the necessity to improve funding for the primary care workforce - she was impressively informed, realistic about the political obstacles, and . . . oh, who am I kidding? We were giddy. We got a picture, too!

On Friday, we visited Jack Resnick, an internist (let's say it: a primary care doctor!) with a practice on Roosevelt Island. "[In Washington,] they're talking about payment reform, which is . . . pffphpht! You have to tear out the guts!" By which he means - you have to alter the incentives so as to drastically reduce hospitalization. It's an open secret that hospitals are not the best places for sick people. They breed infections, deconditioning, delirium, psychosis. Resnick's approach (and the approach of this organization) is to closely monitor the chronically ill patients in his practice, keeping the hospitals at bay by providing patients sophisticated but sensitive care at home. It's more feasible for Resnick because (a) he lives on an island; (b) he's ready to devote himself nearly 24-7 to his patients. But this, he says, is the wave of the future - money saving, intensive, personal primary care for the elderly and chronically ill, taking away money from hospitals where it's not usefully spent (or, rather, uselessly overspent).

Resnick, and the AAHCP (see the link above), are behind the Independence at Home Act, a bill introduced in September which would experiment with cash rewards for house-call physicians that trim Medicare outlays for high-cost patients with multiple chronic conditions.

[revised per comments]

2 comments:

  1. I am not sure how much easier it truly is for Dr. Resnick as he is the only GP on Roosevelt Island with a sizeable base of aging residents. But I certianly understand the point you are making.

    As an aside I found this post by searching on Roosevelt Island and was amused to find the connection as we have many times while I and my family were congregants at T&V and I long ago purchased your Yiddish version of the Cat in the Hat I now live on Roosevelt Island with my family and Dr. Resnick is my primary care physician. Amusing.

    Eric Schwartzman

    ReplyDelete
  2. On Monday, December 29 I will be convening a community forum on Roosevelt Island as part of the Obama Transition Health Care Committee's activities. (You can see more about this event in the Main Street WIRE, Roosevelt Island's community newspaper -http://nyc10044.com/wire/2908/wire2908.pdf . ) It will focus on the success of de-institutionalizing health care -- moving it out of hospitals and nursing homes -- that has been accomplished on Roosevelt Island. This has improved quality, increased patient satisfaction and dramatically cut cost.
    If you and any of your colleagues are interested in attending, I'd love to see you there.
    Jack Resnick

    ReplyDelete